Body frozen when you die so doctors might know how to revive you within the adjectives?
If it were affordable, would you have your body frozen when you die so doctors might be able to revive you surrounded by the future?
Answers:
I might try cryogenics if I was dying of an incurable disease, but bar that, why would you WANT to come back?
Think of it this process: Why would doctors want to revive you in the future? You'd be grossly uneducated by their standards, and would be positively unable to contribute anything at all to society. Not only that, but it'd just add to the overpopulation problems people those days would indubitably have.
So no, nobody should bring themselves frozen.
Also, cryogenics doesn't really work in the kind of magical way you suppose it does.
Cryonics organizations make every attempt NOT to "freeze people". Freezing cause ice damage, which is why modern cryonics organizations replace body hose with anti-freeze mixtures. Animal experiments done with these mixtures indicate excellent preservation of brain structure at cryogenic temperatures when view under high-resolution electron microscopes. The same preservation is expected in humans who are receiving indistinguishable kind of treatment. The avoidance of freezing by cryoprotectant (anti-freeze) replacement is called "vitrification".
Nanomedicine and other molecular repair technologies will be the switch future technologies to fixing the damage cause by disease, aging and cryopreservation. Cryonics is currently working to the extent that means are available to reserve tissues very well so that they can be repaired contained by the future. The prospects of cryonics ultimately working in the future is dependent upon molecular repair technology that seem to be inevitable if civilization survives and technological advance continues. So although cryonics cannot be said to work in a minute, the prospects for cryonics ultimately being made to work -- and being made to work for people preserved today beneath good conditions -- are very good.
The price of cryonics is a one-time grant that can vary anywhere from between $28,000 and $150,000 depending on many factors. For most race who are not too old or sick this can be paid for by having a go insurance policy that names the cryonics organization as beneficiary.
In answer to the question of whether I would consider cryopreservation for myself, this is particularly what I want if I am in a terminal condition and faced with the prospect of burial or cremation. I greatly prefer the possibilities offered by cryonics to burial or cremation. But I greatly much prefer being alive, and I hope that rejuvenation technology is developed quickly enough that I can avoid have to be cryonically preserved (although the chances of this happening quickly plenty for me are not good).
I very much love life. People who are dead miss adjectives the fun, all the love and all the joys of research. Cryonics offers hope, and it is a realistic hope rather than a false hope. Source(s): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryonics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitrificati…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejuvenatio…
Good luck with that.
The technology doesn't exist. When you freeze a body, you create something that will be an unholy mess when thawed. Plus, unresponsive brain + dead.
It's a fantasy at this point. Source(s): MD.
That sounds like an stupid idea.
A much better one is to have your body frozen while you're still alive. Then, when you're unfrozen (assuming the technology exists to prevent cellular damage), you'd be alive instead of purely a thawing corpse.
Related Questions:
What food or fluent psychoanalysis can I do for my anxiety/insomia?
EKG technician commission a fitting choice?
Calcium Calmodium dependent protein kinase?
Answers:
I might try cryogenics if I was dying of an incurable disease, but bar that, why would you WANT to come back?
Think of it this process: Why would doctors want to revive you in the future? You'd be grossly uneducated by their standards, and would be positively unable to contribute anything at all to society. Not only that, but it'd just add to the overpopulation problems people those days would indubitably have.
So no, nobody should bring themselves frozen.
Also, cryogenics doesn't really work in the kind of magical way you suppose it does.
Cryonics organizations make every attempt NOT to "freeze people". Freezing cause ice damage, which is why modern cryonics organizations replace body hose with anti-freeze mixtures. Animal experiments done with these mixtures indicate excellent preservation of brain structure at cryogenic temperatures when view under high-resolution electron microscopes. The same preservation is expected in humans who are receiving indistinguishable kind of treatment. The avoidance of freezing by cryoprotectant (anti-freeze) replacement is called "vitrification".
Nanomedicine and other molecular repair technologies will be the switch future technologies to fixing the damage cause by disease, aging and cryopreservation. Cryonics is currently working to the extent that means are available to reserve tissues very well so that they can be repaired contained by the future. The prospects of cryonics ultimately working in the future is dependent upon molecular repair technology that seem to be inevitable if civilization survives and technological advance continues. So although cryonics cannot be said to work in a minute, the prospects for cryonics ultimately being made to work -- and being made to work for people preserved today beneath good conditions -- are very good.
The price of cryonics is a one-time grant that can vary anywhere from between $28,000 and $150,000 depending on many factors. For most race who are not too old or sick this can be paid for by having a go insurance policy that names the cryonics organization as beneficiary.
In answer to the question of whether I would consider cryopreservation for myself, this is particularly what I want if I am in a terminal condition and faced with the prospect of burial or cremation. I greatly prefer the possibilities offered by cryonics to burial or cremation. But I greatly much prefer being alive, and I hope that rejuvenation technology is developed quickly enough that I can avoid have to be cryonically preserved (although the chances of this happening quickly plenty for me are not good).
I very much love life. People who are dead miss adjectives the fun, all the love and all the joys of research. Cryonics offers hope, and it is a realistic hope rather than a false hope. Source(s): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryonics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitrificati…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejuvenatio…
Good luck with that.
The technology doesn't exist. When you freeze a body, you create something that will be an unholy mess when thawed. Plus, unresponsive brain + dead.
It's a fantasy at this point. Source(s): MD.
That sounds like an stupid idea.
A much better one is to have your body frozen while you're still alive. Then, when you're unfrozen (assuming the technology exists to prevent cellular damage), you'd be alive instead of purely a thawing corpse.
Related Questions: