Hospital treatment within US?
Is it true that in the U.S, hospitals do not give treatment to those that do not have medical insurance or ample money to pay for treatment? (ie. those of low economic status?)
What if it was something vivacity threatening such as a heart attack or gunshot wound?
And, do they recommend procedures (which are not neccessary) just to get more money from the patients?
Answers:
yes they turn you away
All three of these statements are false !
It is against federal regulation for a hospital to refuse treatment to anyone because of inability to pay.
In cases of the second question re: gunshot or heart attack, here again these are priority emergency situations, and no time is lost to verify one's ab ility to pay envelope or check for insurance, they are serviced immediately.
As far as the third question, very seldom do the doctors try to wad the bill by unnecessary tests. I suppose it is being done, but the norm is for them not to get involved contained by these practices, s the penalties are very severe and expensive.
Hospitals in the US that involve yourself in in Medicare or Medicaid (and that's almost all of them) are required by law to offer a medical screening examination to anybody who asks. They aren't even allowed to ask about the ability to clear or method of payment except as a matter of routine registration, so initial care would be okay under way in a gunshot wound, for instance, until that time anybody even asked. If the screening exam suggests an emergency medical condition, the hospital is required to give emergency stabilizing care. This may include multiple surgeries and even months of hospital treatment. And it's all unfunded. Because of that hulking hole in the hospital budget, many try to limit free treatment for non-urgent conditions, though surrounded by practice, the screening exam itself is most of the cost for these problems, so there's little to be done.
Yes, some hospitals do encourage needless testing. It isn't so much to generate extra income as it is a foolish idee fixe that more care is better care and somehow reduces liability, because we own a very litigious society. In addition, since we don't have that abundant limits on treatment being imposed by the government, near are wide variations in the rate of correct procedures (coronary angiography comes to mind), because there is no universally accepted "best practice," so regional variations are to be expected.
No they do not turn you away. I am an emergency room intern and can assure you I do not know if someone has insurance or not. As far as your last query, you are free to get a second opinion about any procedure.
Check out the link below, it's within regard to EMTALA or Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_M…
The act requires hospitals and ambulance services to provide care to anyone need emergency treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay.
Hospitals can't turn away any natural life threatening issues like a heart attack or a woman in labor, they have to purloin them no matter what.
Related Questions:
My girl friend is audible range a train horn surrounded by both ears when within isn't any trian hard by?
Does river eat up the effects of tablets?
How do you confer an IV?
What if it was something vivacity threatening such as a heart attack or gunshot wound?
And, do they recommend procedures (which are not neccessary) just to get more money from the patients?
Answers:
yes they turn you away
All three of these statements are false !
It is against federal regulation for a hospital to refuse treatment to anyone because of inability to pay.
In cases of the second question re: gunshot or heart attack, here again these are priority emergency situations, and no time is lost to verify one's ab ility to pay envelope or check for insurance, they are serviced immediately.
As far as the third question, very seldom do the doctors try to wad the bill by unnecessary tests. I suppose it is being done, but the norm is for them not to get involved contained by these practices, s the penalties are very severe and expensive.
Hospitals in the US that involve yourself in in Medicare or Medicaid (and that's almost all of them) are required by law to offer a medical screening examination to anybody who asks. They aren't even allowed to ask about the ability to clear or method of payment except as a matter of routine registration, so initial care would be okay under way in a gunshot wound, for instance, until that time anybody even asked. If the screening exam suggests an emergency medical condition, the hospital is required to give emergency stabilizing care. This may include multiple surgeries and even months of hospital treatment. And it's all unfunded. Because of that hulking hole in the hospital budget, many try to limit free treatment for non-urgent conditions, though surrounded by practice, the screening exam itself is most of the cost for these problems, so there's little to be done.
Yes, some hospitals do encourage needless testing. It isn't so much to generate extra income as it is a foolish idee fixe that more care is better care and somehow reduces liability, because we own a very litigious society. In addition, since we don't have that abundant limits on treatment being imposed by the government, near are wide variations in the rate of correct procedures (coronary angiography comes to mind), because there is no universally accepted "best practice," so regional variations are to be expected.
No they do not turn you away. I am an emergency room intern and can assure you I do not know if someone has insurance or not. As far as your last query, you are free to get a second opinion about any procedure.
Check out the link below, it's within regard to EMTALA or Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_M…
The act requires hospitals and ambulance services to provide care to anyone need emergency treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay.
Hospitals can't turn away any natural life threatening issues like a heart attack or a woman in labor, they have to purloin them no matter what.
Related Questions: