Do you suggest Pharmacists should hold more responsibility?
do you think a GP should consult a pharmacist when he/she is not sure? Also Do you think Pharmacists should have one and the same salary as GP as the Pharmacists are liable if the GP gets the dosage wrong? Whats every ones opinion on this thing, just had a conversation about this the other morning with someone! One last thing, what does culture think about the role of the pharmacist in years to come, as it keep changing! Thanks1
Answers:
(a)ToxLabRat: Great answer. Couldn't own said it better myself.
I'm not sure how things work over there, but in the US, primary supervision physicians often speak with pharmacists about which drug contained by a class of similar ones is currently on formulary, and that's about it. With our lack of a general system, respectively insurer has his list of drugs he prefers within a pernickety class, and it's impossible to keep up with each one's enumerate. If the physician has a question about treatment, you can bet it's a quiz about pathophysiology, not pharmacology, and the pharmacist will rarely be of use as a consultant. You grossly underestimate the abilities and training of the GP. Of course, everybody make mistakes, and anybody who notices one should question what appears to be a dosage error, but that's more commonly because the physician is purposefully using a dosage that's different from standard for a use that's different from standard than it is because he doesn't know what he's about.
First of all, I think that pharmacists already own a very huge amount of responsibilty resting on their shoulders. Think for a moment about just one pharmacy close by you, and then think about freshly how many prescriptions are filled in that one pharmacy per light of day. All of those Rxs are the responsibility of the pharmacist. He/she is responsible for it all, and if someone gets the wrong medication in their bottle due to a mistake, after the consequences can be extremley grave! There are many examples but one common one is those people who hold serious allergies and if given the wrong meds, they could go into anaphalyxis and die. On top of having to be responsible for all of those scripts going out the door, they also catch phone calls and consults all of the time from worried patients who want to know what they can and cannot take beside their current list of medications, what they can and cannot give their child, whether or not the route they are feeling is a result of their medications, ect. So I would say they own plenty of responsibility.
I do believe that in most cases pharmacists know the most about drug compounds and I do not think it is a doomed to failure idea to consult your pharmacist when being prescribed a new drug, as most doctors are so overworked right in a minute that they may not realize that the med they gave you is not the best one they could have with your roll of medications. However, I do not think that a doctor should have to consult beside a pharmacist before prescribing anything, as they had to go through a large amount of schooling as well, and are plenty capable of knowing pharmacology and staying up to date on new drugs and how they may impact a patients drug regimen.
I reflect that as things continue (if unchanged) then our medical professionals will continue to be overworked and forced to see more patients surrounded by one work day than they should ever have to. With that being said, I believe that the pharmacists role surrounded by patient care will probably increase just because they will enjoy to pick up a lot of the slack that is left over from doctors not have the proper time to spend with their patients and really go over and explain the meds they are prescribing. Eventually, the pharmacists too, will probably have more long-suffering consults than they can handle, and we will probably be in need of plentiful more pharmacists in the days to come. Even considering all of the new drugs that are going to the souk, would lead one to believe that pharmacology will be increasing substantially over the years to come. Source(s): Toxicologist
Related Questions:
What are the affects of oxycontin when snorted?
Are anadin extra tablets a complete con? (more adjectives info than a question)?
Can quitting caffeine give a hand net overcoming a benzo addiction easier?
Answers:
(a)ToxLabRat: Great answer. Couldn't own said it better myself.
I'm not sure how things work over there, but in the US, primary supervision physicians often speak with pharmacists about which drug contained by a class of similar ones is currently on formulary, and that's about it. With our lack of a general system, respectively insurer has his list of drugs he prefers within a pernickety class, and it's impossible to keep up with each one's enumerate. If the physician has a question about treatment, you can bet it's a quiz about pathophysiology, not pharmacology, and the pharmacist will rarely be of use as a consultant. You grossly underestimate the abilities and training of the GP. Of course, everybody make mistakes, and anybody who notices one should question what appears to be a dosage error, but that's more commonly because the physician is purposefully using a dosage that's different from standard for a use that's different from standard than it is because he doesn't know what he's about.
First of all, I think that pharmacists already own a very huge amount of responsibilty resting on their shoulders. Think for a moment about just one pharmacy close by you, and then think about freshly how many prescriptions are filled in that one pharmacy per light of day. All of those Rxs are the responsibility of the pharmacist. He/she is responsible for it all, and if someone gets the wrong medication in their bottle due to a mistake, after the consequences can be extremley grave! There are many examples but one common one is those people who hold serious allergies and if given the wrong meds, they could go into anaphalyxis and die. On top of having to be responsible for all of those scripts going out the door, they also catch phone calls and consults all of the time from worried patients who want to know what they can and cannot take beside their current list of medications, what they can and cannot give their child, whether or not the route they are feeling is a result of their medications, ect. So I would say they own plenty of responsibility.
I do believe that in most cases pharmacists know the most about drug compounds and I do not think it is a doomed to failure idea to consult your pharmacist when being prescribed a new drug, as most doctors are so overworked right in a minute that they may not realize that the med they gave you is not the best one they could have with your roll of medications. However, I do not think that a doctor should have to consult beside a pharmacist before prescribing anything, as they had to go through a large amount of schooling as well, and are plenty capable of knowing pharmacology and staying up to date on new drugs and how they may impact a patients drug regimen.
I reflect that as things continue (if unchanged) then our medical professionals will continue to be overworked and forced to see more patients surrounded by one work day than they should ever have to. With that being said, I believe that the pharmacists role surrounded by patient care will probably increase just because they will enjoy to pick up a lot of the slack that is left over from doctors not have the proper time to spend with their patients and really go over and explain the meds they are prescribing. Eventually, the pharmacists too, will probably have more long-suffering consults than they can handle, and we will probably be in need of plentiful more pharmacists in the days to come. Even considering all of the new drugs that are going to the souk, would lead one to believe that pharmacology will be increasing substantially over the years to come. Source(s): Toxicologist
Related Questions: