Would you practice prescription if you singular made $20 per hour? (Please read details beforehand answering though.)?
typo- hypothetical
Answers:
As a PT, I wouldn't even do this...unless my housing be covered as well....
I went to PT school for 6 years...I love what I do, but I also spot that I provide a valuable service. As such, I expect to live comfortably...not extravagant, but comfortably.
...I had a full scholarship and my malpractice is covered by the facility I money for, I do own an additional policy, but it's only $120 a year... I made more than $20 an hour when I was a exotic graduate ten years ago....and it was much less than I was expecting to formulate
Consider that a typical physician puts in way more hours than 40 a week, and I don't think you'll procure many takers on the $20 an hour plan...burn out would occur rather swiftly....
I honestly don't know. I might extraordinarily well have taught elevated school, instead, with better benefits, much better hours, and state-guaranteed retirement. And I would have have a life in my twenties. The concept of actually have been home with the kids at Christmas when they were little does enjoy its appeal. And those 100-hour weeks when I was a resident could have been spent partying. But I do wallow in medicine.
No, I don't think your idea have much to do with the expenses in current medical care. Considering adjectives the sacrifices, even with student loans and malpractice insurance not an issue, doctors making $150k per year or so, typical for primary care, is just about excessive, and there's nothing unreasonable about higher incomes for other specialties. You've set the tavern too low. Nurse practitioners have higher incomes, fewer risks and responsibilities, and a huge amount smaller quantity education and training. There is an imbalance in reimbursement when our method of stipend is so driven by what procedures are done. Doctors with reasonable salaries and small productivity bonuses tend to behave differently from doctors whose practices are entirely enterpreneurial. That's be addressed in the current debate to an extent, but your hypothetical situation is seriously out of balance.
If all the overhead, insurance and other costs to the doctor are picked up, I think you would find plenty of people to work for that wage.
It sounds like a good concept, but who is going to pay for the organization, nurse and medical supplies. If the doctor has to pay, then I regard as it should be $20 per patient seen rather than per hour.
Related Questions:
Why are patients given a brackish solution earlier a bowel operation? how does it relief?
How could trial medicine be found, researched, and harvest from the precipitation forest properly?
Elimination of street drugs?
Answers:
As a PT, I wouldn't even do this...unless my housing be covered as well....
I went to PT school for 6 years...I love what I do, but I also spot that I provide a valuable service. As such, I expect to live comfortably...not extravagant, but comfortably.
...I had a full scholarship and my malpractice is covered by the facility I money for, I do own an additional policy, but it's only $120 a year... I made more than $20 an hour when I was a exotic graduate ten years ago....and it was much less than I was expecting to formulate
Consider that a typical physician puts in way more hours than 40 a week, and I don't think you'll procure many takers on the $20 an hour plan...burn out would occur rather swiftly....
I honestly don't know. I might extraordinarily well have taught elevated school, instead, with better benefits, much better hours, and state-guaranteed retirement. And I would have have a life in my twenties. The concept of actually have been home with the kids at Christmas when they were little does enjoy its appeal. And those 100-hour weeks when I was a resident could have been spent partying. But I do wallow in medicine.
No, I don't think your idea have much to do with the expenses in current medical care. Considering adjectives the sacrifices, even with student loans and malpractice insurance not an issue, doctors making $150k per year or so, typical for primary care, is just about excessive, and there's nothing unreasonable about higher incomes for other specialties. You've set the tavern too low. Nurse practitioners have higher incomes, fewer risks and responsibilities, and a huge amount smaller quantity education and training. There is an imbalance in reimbursement when our method of stipend is so driven by what procedures are done. Doctors with reasonable salaries and small productivity bonuses tend to behave differently from doctors whose practices are entirely enterpreneurial. That's be addressed in the current debate to an extent, but your hypothetical situation is seriously out of balance.
If all the overhead, insurance and other costs to the doctor are picked up, I think you would find plenty of people to work for that wage.
It sounds like a good concept, but who is going to pay for the organization, nurse and medical supplies. If the doctor has to pay, then I regard as it should be $20 per patient seen rather than per hour.
Related Questions: