In an emergency would a vet know how to treat a human and would a doctor know how to treat an animal.?
Who would fair better. Vets have to treat all different kind of species while doctors treat only one. Just wondered.
Answers:
It might be different for different states, but The Kansas Veterinary Practice Act does allow licensed veterinarians to administer emergency treatment to humans without any liability against them. It also allows for anyone to administer aid to animals contained by emergency situations whether they are a medical doctor or a fry cook at McDonalds.
As to who would fare better, my guess is that it depends on the species and the specialty of the veterinarian. A doctor would probably have no idea about horse or cattle physiology, but they might do adjectives right with a dog. A veterinarian that is a primate specialist would probably fare pretty well beside a human, but one that specializes in birds probalby wouldn't fare very well. However, contained by vet school when learning comparative anatomy human anatomy is often included as economically so a student, or a vet straight out of school would probably do very well.
Aside from the legal issues, the DVM would be much better at treating a human than a MD would be at treating most animals, the exception being another primate.
The anatomy and physiology are amazingly similar between domestic animals and physiologically speaking, humans are not more complicated than a cat or dog, and may be less complicated than a ruminant. However, pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism are very different and species specific. A vet would have a standard idea about most of the different species and definitely know going on for those species he or she specializes in plus have a general conception of the human side of it because veterinarians are taught a lot of comparative anatomy, and being human themselves can probably craft a fair guess on things from personal experience.
I think that a doctor (MD) would be better competent to treat an animal simply because there would be less stress in trying to treat an animal vs. a human. Anatomy is a non-issue. In emergency, maintaining respirations, compressions, IV, etc. would not seem to be a big issue with an animal, at smallest to me. However, if I was a DVM, I would be pretty stressed out if I had to treat a human for the first time.
Docs could treat animals better than a vet could treat a human. Besides, I give attention to a vet could get into a lot of trouble tying to treat a human. Many meds used in animals can't be used contained by people, but most human medication can be used in animals. Comparative anatomy/biology wouldn't be of much help, because the human body is really glossed over so against the clock as to be almost ignored and it is very complex. Musch more complex and a rat, mouse or dog.
the vet surrounded by prision break sewed back on tee bags mitt
i think a vet would know how to treat a human in extreme circumstances
a doctor would probably be able to treat an mammal far easier than any other animal due to the similarities between human physiology and mammal physiology
the vet would fair better i believe. but its a difficult ring to make
good question ! :D
in an emergency, i think a 'people' doctor wouldnt touch a animal. but both could get something done a emergency surgery on any if the need arised, like stuck on a plain and there the just one that could possibly help.
but i dont think it would ever happen since you can catch emergency vets or doctors.
Related Questions:
Is it true that injecting gypsy tears into your vein give you matching buzz as licking tv antenna's?
A prescription medication list a singular side effect of impair the movement of smooth muscle.?
Have you ever took prilosec & it bequeath u headache?
Answers:
It might be different for different states, but The Kansas Veterinary Practice Act does allow licensed veterinarians to administer emergency treatment to humans without any liability against them. It also allows for anyone to administer aid to animals contained by emergency situations whether they are a medical doctor or a fry cook at McDonalds.
As to who would fare better, my guess is that it depends on the species and the specialty of the veterinarian. A doctor would probably have no idea about horse or cattle physiology, but they might do adjectives right with a dog. A veterinarian that is a primate specialist would probably fare pretty well beside a human, but one that specializes in birds probalby wouldn't fare very well. However, contained by vet school when learning comparative anatomy human anatomy is often included as economically so a student, or a vet straight out of school would probably do very well.
Aside from the legal issues, the DVM would be much better at treating a human than a MD would be at treating most animals, the exception being another primate.
The anatomy and physiology are amazingly similar between domestic animals and physiologically speaking, humans are not more complicated than a cat or dog, and may be less complicated than a ruminant. However, pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism are very different and species specific. A vet would have a standard idea about most of the different species and definitely know going on for those species he or she specializes in plus have a general conception of the human side of it because veterinarians are taught a lot of comparative anatomy, and being human themselves can probably craft a fair guess on things from personal experience.
I think that a doctor (MD) would be better competent to treat an animal simply because there would be less stress in trying to treat an animal vs. a human. Anatomy is a non-issue. In emergency, maintaining respirations, compressions, IV, etc. would not seem to be a big issue with an animal, at smallest to me. However, if I was a DVM, I would be pretty stressed out if I had to treat a human for the first time.
Docs could treat animals better than a vet could treat a human. Besides, I give attention to a vet could get into a lot of trouble tying to treat a human. Many meds used in animals can't be used contained by people, but most human medication can be used in animals. Comparative anatomy/biology wouldn't be of much help, because the human body is really glossed over so against the clock as to be almost ignored and it is very complex. Musch more complex and a rat, mouse or dog.
the vet surrounded by prision break sewed back on tee bags mitt
i think a vet would know how to treat a human in extreme circumstances
a doctor would probably be able to treat an mammal far easier than any other animal due to the similarities between human physiology and mammal physiology
the vet would fair better i believe. but its a difficult ring to make
good question ! :D
in an emergency, i think a 'people' doctor wouldnt touch a animal. but both could get something done a emergency surgery on any if the need arised, like stuck on a plain and there the just one that could possibly help.
but i dont think it would ever happen since you can catch emergency vets or doctors.
Related Questions: